A reality in today’s market is that litigation is part of the business. A Business Litigation Lawyer Washington DC trusts can assist with conflicts in the workplace, commercial disputes between companies, allegations of faulty or dangerous products, and other business-related problems, businesses regularly have the need for a lawyer that specializes in business litigation and other business-related legal matters. Without a reliable business litigation lawyer who is familiar with their particular kind of business or company, many owners are required to turn their attention away from their customers or clients and from running their business or company, to dispute resolution and courtrooms. An experienced Washington, DC business litigation lawyer whose sound legal strategies reflect a deep understanding of business principles can help to keep your business out of the courtroom, and to prevail in the event an issue cannot be resolved without going there.
Business & Litigation
When a business owner is facing the possibility of litigation, they need to take proactive steps to protect their legal rights and financial interests. Retaining the help of a skilled Washington DC business litigation lawyer who is experienced with successfully helping businesses do this can be an efficient and effective way to get this done compared to trying to do this on your own or with a lawyer who does not have what it takes to handle the job.
Eric Siegel Law is equipped to handle a wide array of business litigation issues. From small to medium-sized business disputes to the most complex corporate litigation, Eric Siegel excels at protecting the rights of businesses and their owners while minimizing risks in litigation.
Our business litigation practice includes but is not limited to the following areas of representation for plaintiffs and defendants:
When the viability and health of your business is at stake, it is important to have a reliable lawyer on your side who understands the complexities of modern business practices and problems. Clients of Eric Siegel Law trust us with their sensitive and critical litigation because we consistently deliver favorable results.
When possible, we are aggressive in our quest to find litigation solutions that do not include having to go to trial. We have significant experience with successfully handling mediation and arbitration and only go to trial when it is absolutely necessary to do this to get our clients what they are entitled to. We like to settle – but we don’t settle for less than what our clients need and for all of what they should be compensated for. When we structure settlements, we try to look at all aspects of the overall insurance, regulatory, and tax implications for both, the near and long-term future. When a trial is necessary to get our clients what they should be compensated with, we bring with us to the courtroom our experience, exceptional skills, and our impressive record of success.
If you need a highly rated business litigation lawyer in Washington, D.C. with a track record of successfully defending their clients’ needs, contact Eric Siegel Law for a free consultation today.
In Washington D.C., it is unlawful for a third party to intentionally interfere with a commercial contract that has been agreed upon by two other parties. Indeed, this type of misconduct is known as tortious interference. Victims of tortious interference can bring a legal claim to hold the third party liable for any damages that they have sustained because of the contract breach. The following is a brief overview of tortious interference. If you are having contract issues, contact Eric Siegel Law to speak with a Washington, D.C. business litigation lawyer.
There are two types of tort claims a plaintiff can file if he or she has suffered an injury. A
negligent tort is filed when the defendant (at-fault party) owed the plaintiff (the victim) a duty of
care, breached that duty of care, and that breach caused the plaintiff harm. An intentional tort is
filed when the defendant intended to cause harm to the plaintiff or otherwise knew their actions
would cause harm.
As a business litigation lawyer in Washington, D.C. can explain, there are two types of tortious
interference claims. The first type is called interference with prospective economic advantage
(“IWPEA”). There are many acts that fall under the IWPEA umbrella, including contracts. The
second type is called interference with contractual relations (“IWCR”). Inducing a breach of
contract falls under this type.
Allegations that a third party tried to undermine a valid contract are not sufficient enough to
establish liability. In order to prove tortious interference under the law, a Washington, D.C.
business litigation lawyer must be able to prove the following five things before the court:
The following is an example of tortious interference:
John owns a widget distribution company. He sells his company to Dave. In the sales contract,
John agrees he will not sell widgets anymore, agreeing he is out of the widget business. A
couple of years later, John is contacted by Jim. Jim owns a widget manufacturing plant, and he
talks John into distributing his widgets. John agrees, even though this is in direct violation of his
contract with Dave.
Dave can file a tortious interference lawsuit against Jim because he had induced John to violate
his contract with Dave. Jim would be liable for any financial damages Dave suffered from loss of
business. Dave could also file a breach of contract lawsuit against John, as well.
A skilled business litigation lawyer Washington, D.C. clients recommend from our firm can help.
At Eric Siegel Law, we have extensive experience drafting and reviewing business contracts, as
well as litigating contractual disputes. To set up your free business law consultation, please
contact us today.