employment litigation lawyer Ellicott City, MD

A growing legal battle involving religious autonomy and employment rights has reached the nation’s highest court, raising questions that many individuals might discuss with our Ellicott City, MD employment litigation lawyer when workplace disputes intersect with faith-based organizations. In February 2026, 50 current and former leaders within the Southern Baptist Convention and related Baptist bodies filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a lawsuit brought by former Baptist Convention of Maryland/Delaware executive director Will McRaney against the North American Mission Board (NAMB).

McRaney alleges that NAMB interfered with his employment, leading to his termination, and later influenced other Baptist organizations not to hire him. NAMB has argued that the case is barred by the “ministerial exception,” also known as the ecclesiastical exemption doctrine, which limits government involvement in matters of religious governance and internal church decisions.

The case has traveled a lengthy procedural path. Initially filed in the Mississippi state court in 2017, it was moved to federal court and dismissed in 2019 under the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine. In 2020, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived the case, stating that more factual development was necessary and that it was not yet clear whether adjudicating the claims would require resolving purely religious questions.

After further proceedings, the district court again dismissed the case in 2023, prompting another appeal. Now, supporters are asking the Supreme Court to determine whether civil courts may hear claims involving alleged interference and defamation when separate religious entities are involved, or whether church autonomy bars such review altogether.

When Employment Disputes Involve Religious Entities

Employment conflicts within religious organizations can present unique legal challenges. Individuals facing termination or alleged interference with professional opportunities often seek guidance from our employment law attorneys to understand how constitutional doctrines and civil employment protections may apply.

At Eric Siegel Law, we assist clients in evaluating whether their claims fall within recognized exceptions or whether civil courts may properly exercise jurisdiction. While the ministerial exception can limit certain lawsuits involving clergy or religious leadership roles, not every employment-related claim is automatically barred. Courts frequently examine the employee’s duties, the nature of the alleged misconduct, and whether resolving the dispute requires interpreting religious doctrine.

Through our wrongful termination attorneys, we represent individuals who believe they were dismissed in violation of contractual rights or public policy. In some cases, allegations may include reputational harm, interference with future employment, or retaliation. Our Ellicott City employment litigation attorneys assess whether adverse actions were taken in response to protected activity.

Employment disputes are not limited to termination. Our practice extends to guidance from our wage and hour dispute lawyers, who handle claims involving unpaid compensation, unequal treatment, or other workplace violations. Even in religious settings, employees may have enforceable rights depending on the specific facts and governing law.

If you are facing termination, interference with your employment opportunities, or another workplace dispute, contact Eric Siegel Law to speak with our Ellicott City employment litigation lawyers. We are prepared to review your situation, explain your options, and help you determine the appropriate next steps. We have 30 years of experience under our belts, allowing us to effectively help those facing situations involving employment litigation. Having been recognized by Best Lawyers, our clients know that we’re the ones to trust. When it comes to litigation, we’re on your side. Schedule a consultation today to discuss how your rights may be protected under applicable law.